Thursday, December 18, 2008

Viral Video

U.S. Economy : The Philosopher's Stone
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8PIEGK0IbA4

The dollar is done.

For those of you who have been living under a rock, with your eyes closed and your fingers in your ears... the US dollar is done. We've started the great fall of the US dollar. I can only hope that the US dollar finds support at the 76 and/or 72- 71 level on the dollar index. The dollar is falling like a stone. This was not unexpected... but is certainly very scary. It is now only a matter of time before the headlines in the morning newspapers read "Dollar Crisis!". This is when the fun really begins and we will enter a phase of economic catastrophe the likes of which no one on this Earth has ever experienced. I just hope we all have a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, for it may be our last. 2009 will be a seriously fucked up year, and i suspect that we are living through the last few months of a normal existence. When the crisis hits, the world will turn into a global Iceland/Greece bankruptcy/riot atmosphere... and the true battle against the New World Order will begin. I can only hope and prey that freedom prevails and tyranny is squashed. Otherwise, we will enter a new dark ages of Global Socialism/Communism control that will enslave humanity for decades to come.

Oh, and i forgot to mention WWIII. It will probably be best to live in the Southern Hemisphere such as Australia/New Zealand or South America (Costa Rica, Peru, Ecuador, etc.). Unfortunately, there probably will be a WWIII.... since i really don't think that we have progressed very much since WWI and WWII. The first two world wars happened, even though i'm sure most people did not recognize the signs leading up to the global war. The world is setting up for a new World War eventually. WWI happened. WWII happened. Why couldn't WWIII happen? Are things really that different? If anything, things are more the same now than ever. The ultimate goal is a world government with a one world army, currency and central bank. The New World Order is making their move, with Obama as their leader. The economic crisis is about to show its true colours and the world will have to deal with the reality of the situation in 2009. May we live in interesting times.

Universal Soldier
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QLzUNDaF00U

Wednesday, December 17, 2008

IMF Chief Warns of "Social Unrest"

The UK's Guardian newspaper reported on a recent speech by Strauss-Kahn, the head of the International Monetary Fund, in Madrid:

"If we are not able to do that, then social unrest may happen in many countries - including advanced economies," Strauss-Kahn said.

He added that violent protests could break out in countries worldwide if the financial system was not restructured to benefit everyone rather than a small elite.

IMF chief issues stark warning on economic crisis
Angela Balakrishnan
guardian.co.uk, Tuesday 16 December 2008 09.24 GMT
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/dec/16/imf-financial-crisis


IMF Chief Warns Of Riots In Response To Economic Crisis
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Wednesday, December 17, 2008
http://www.infowars.com/?p=6603

Tuesday, December 16, 2008

Stock Recomendations

The two stocks I like the most right now are:

MINEFINDERS LTD (AMEX: MFN)

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=mfn

MAG SILVER CORP (MAG.TO)

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=mag.to


Time/Date: 2:47am, December 17th, 2008. (Tuesday Night/Wednesday Morning)

MFN: $4.55
MAG: $5.44

A lot of the other junior stocks I like have already moved up substantially. These are the last two that have yet to move. MFN just made a higher high. This is the first time it made a higher high in over 1 year. I suspect it will also make a higher low, and resume a bull market trend back to rally to around the $10 level. I think MFN will at least double within the next 4 months. Obviously minefinders had a huge move yesterday, (up about 20%)... but i suspect there will be more of these days to come. It will just move up out of the blue again one day, and the only way to profit from it, is to just own it and hold it. The moves are too quick to catch to wait for an ideal time. It can obviously come down again in the short term, but i suspect it will make a higher low, so if there are short term declines, they shouldn't be too drastic or long lived.

It looks to me like the lows are in for MAG silver as well. I think the move in MAG silver could be explosive, and rise to the $10 to $15 range within the next 4 months as well. Despite a big move up in the price of silver yesterday, MAG.TO did not really respond to the rise in price. I think this is just a delayed reaction, and once investors realize that single digit silver prices are now a thing of the past, MAG.TO should spike higher.

Still waiting for a clear sign that TBT has bottomed. It's got to be getting pretty close by now, but it would be better to wait until there is substantial evidence that a bottom is in. I wouldn't try to catch the falling knife, but just keep an eye on it, and jump in when it makes a big rally.

I think these will be great investments for the next month. The concern of downside risk will be if there is another period of forced liquidation and market crashes, similar to what we saw in October 2008. It is possible that we could experience another episode of what we saw in October... this time, only worse. If markets make new lows in the first quarter of 2009, then all stock prices may fall again. However, it is very possible that the US dollar falls in this environment also, offsetting declines in some stocks, while sending precious metals and their mining stocks much higher. The people orchestrating the collapse have the capability to bankrupt and buy out any company they wish. The central banks can print as much money as they please, and lend it to the government, who can then buy up any asset they wish. It is theoretically possible to virtually bankrupt every single company, whip out all the shareholders, and have a government bailout/takeover/nationalization of the assets so that they can steal the asset for free. If the governments can bankrupt a businesses by cutting off their liquidity, drive their share price to zero, then buy out the company... it can eliminate ownership of these valuable assets by individuals. All companies will then be owned by governments, international organizations, central banks and international corporations. Once the public has been stripped of all of their assets, they will only be left with paper currency. Then the paper currencies can be hyperinflated, thereby confiscating all the wealth of the people. So long term, there is a chance that the New World Order will try to steal these assets from the public. The reason they want to steal them is because they are valuable. So when buying assets like this, it is important to realize that the pin stripe bandits can steal assets... if you just buy physical gold and silver that you can hold in your hands, it is much more difficult to confiscate. But until we see signs of another forced liquidation phase, i think these two stocks will perform very well. And clearly, anyone can look at these charts and realize how much value they have come down over the last year. Current shareholders have lost a lot of money over the last year holding these stocks, and there is no guarantee that they cannot lose a lot more value still. These stocks are risky investments. Physical gold and silver are much safer investments... but for people looking to recoup some of their losses, i think these stocks are the best chance at a quick recovery for investors still in the red.

Anyone who claims to know anything with 100% certainty is probably either a fool or a liar. No one knows for sure what will happen in the short term or even the long term for that matter. Long term predictions can be made with greater certainly, however, there are many unforeseeable variables that could enter into the equation.

Right now, gold is right around the crucial $850 support. The US dollar is also right around the long term support level of 80 on the US dollar index. The US dollar could rally back up to 84, sending gold back down to between $770 and $800. It is also possible that the dollar keeps falling and gold breaks above $900 as the dollar falls below 80. I personally think it will just keep falling into the mid 70's, sending the DOW to between 10,000 and 11,000... sending silver over $15 and gold towards $1000. That's just my short term guess. And this will probably occur in the lead up to Obama taking office.

Once Obama takes office, all bets are off. I suspect that once Obama takes office, there will be another crisis shortly thereafter. Probably in late January. I think it will either be another stock market crisis (similar to what we experienced in October, only on a grander scale, with all stock markets making new lows and many companies going bankrupt). Another option is a currency crisis, where the US dollar just keeps falling and we get a dollar collapse. A third option would be a foreign policy crisis. Maybe a war between India and Pakistan where the US and Israel side with India and invade Pakistan. We could see another false-flag terrorist attack, possibly even bigger than 9/11, such as a massive attack (biological, nuclear, etc.) on a major US city like Los Angles or Chicago. Or maybe some other crisis that I haven't thought of. Any crisis can be met with civil unrest, shortages and martial law.

So i like those two stocks for the upcoming month. After Obama gets elected, there are so many different things that could happen, that it is difficult to know the best way to prepare. I still think the best thing to do is: to own physical gold and silver in your possession; Some physical gold held overseas such as in the Perth Mint or GoldMoney; A variety of foreign currencies/short term bonds such as the Euro, Singapore Dollar, Yen, Australian Dollar, New Zealand Dollar, Korean Won, Chinese Yuan, etc; These currencies and assets should be held with a bank and broker in your home country, as well as a country abroad. A bank account in a country like Singapore, Germany or Australia would be prudent preparation; hold physical paper cash of various foreign currencies along with your gold; It is good to own conservative dividend paying foreign stocks such as agriculture stocks in New Zealand, maybe a utility in Singapore, and an oil service stock in Indonesia, for examples. Basically, just buy the EuroPac recommended stocks.

It is tough to know whether cash and bonds or stocks or precious metals will be better investments though this crisis. Since the goal is just to protect and preserve wealth, it is best to just be as diversified as possible so that wealth will be persevered no matter what the environment. Also, it is best to get as far away from the United States as possible, and this could mean getting out of Canada as well. I still recommend dumping all US stocks (with possible exceptions for certain mining companies)... but investors should not load up on Canadian stocks either. It is fine to have some investments in Canada, but I would not put a heavy weighting on Canadian stocks over other foreign stocks. Especially since similar investments can be made in Australia, which I expect to perform better than their Canadian counterparts.

People all around the world are going to have to work very hard and make decisive decisions to ensure that they protect their wealth over the coming years. Most people in the western world will go bankrupt and either be debt slaves or extremely poor. Most baby boomers will not get the retirement they thought they were going to get. Thankfully, for those who recognize the severity of the crisis, they still have time to get their house in order and invest a lifetime of savings so that wealth will be persevered when we come out the other side of this mess. Anyone stuck sitting on their hands doing nothing, assuming things will work out, will experience a drastic reduction in their standard of living. Those who take steps to protect their wealth by buying gold and the other asset classes I've recommended will probably prosper and enjoy a life of luxury by being on the receiving end of the biggest transfer of wealth the world has ever seen.

----------------------------------

The material provided in this report is for general informational purposes only. No information in this or any of my reports is intended as securities brokerage, investment, tax, accounting or legal advice, as an offer or solicitation of an offer to sell or buy, or as an endorsement, recommendation or sponsorship of any company, security, or fund. The information in my newsletters should not be relied upon for purposes of transacting securities or other investments. I cannot and do not assess, verify or guarantee the adequacy, accuracy or completeness of any information, the suitability or profitability of any particular investment, or the potential value of any investment or informational source. You bear responsibility for your own investment research and decisions, and should seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before making any investment.

Sunday, November 30, 2008

My Response to the Deflationists

Does the word "Federal Reserve" or the name "Ben Bernanke" ever enter into your line of reasoning? Whenever i read an article by someone promoting a deflation theory and low gold price, I always find that they never mention the Fed or Helicopter Ben.

Do the deflationists want to have me believe that the Federal Reserve and Ben Bernanke will have the ability to create as many dollars as they please, and spend them any way they chose, and no matter how much they print, the dollar will go up in value? Surely, if they create enough new money and credit, they can turn deflation into inflation. If the Federal Government mails a check to every American, that must counteract the deflation to some degree. All the money that was spent to bailout all these financial institutions and banks was created out of thin air and out of debt. I would agree that we might have seen deflation if there were no bailouts and stimulus plans... but given the amount of money printing going on (bloomberg just reported the total cost of the bailouts so far is over $7 trillion)... i think we will get inflation.

The government mailed out over $150 billion in stimulus checks, giving most Americans roughly $600 to spend. So would the deflationists have me believe that the government is able to send checks to every American, and then when they go to spend this money, it will actually buy more and more goods and services? What if the Government mailed everyone a check for $10,000?... or $1 million? or $1 billion? Clearly, if the Federal Reserve prints enough money, and the Government spends enough money, they can turn a deflation into an inflation. Obama's budget deficit is shaping up to be over $2 trillion his first year. If other countries stop lending money to finance this deficit, and the federal reserve just prints the money, how big a budget deficit can he run? Could Obama run a $10 trillion budget deficit financed with a printing press and still have the dollar go up in value? How about $50 trillion? How big can the bailouts be before they become inflationary? How large can the balance sheet of the Federal Reserve grow?

Clearly, when looking at the issue from this perspective, any rational person would have to agree that if enough money is printed, it will create inflation. The question is, how much money needs to be printed before deflation turns to inflation? Well, i think we're about to find out. We're up over $7 trillion so far, and that's only been over the last few months. Now, some argue that the deflationary forces are too big, that bailout money is going into a black hole or is being horded by banks... that there were over $1 quadrillion in derivatives, and there is too much to unwind and deleverage. These people would have us believe that there is no cost to the bailouts, and that we can bail out everyone by printing money and this will not have any inflationary consequences. They are saying that the money that is being created out of nothing, in order to bail out everyone, will continue to go up in value no matter how big the bailouts become?

Basically, the people who make the bet on the dollar and on deflation, are betting that Bernanke cannot print enough, and Obama cannot spend enough. Mr. Bernanke is the money printing champion of the world, and Mr. Obama will probably become the money spending champion of the world (who will probably take the title away from George W. Bush, the current spending champ). I would not underestimate these men and their ability to print and spend money. They have basically already told us that they will print and spend as much money as needed. Their philosophical belief is that they can fix this crisis by printing and spending money. Bernanke learned the wrong lessons from studying the great depression and came away with the false belief that the great depression was caused because the Fed could not print enough money. Bernanke is a money printer... that's why they brought him in. They brought him in to fight the deflation monster, and i've placed my bets on Bernanke and Obama winning the fight against the deflation monster. They may not win the fight in the first round, or the second... but eventually, they will deliver a knock out blow and defeat the deflation monster. Unfortunately, this will create an even bigger inflation monster, and the inflation monster will ultimately win the fight in the end. I buy gold.

Sunday, November 23, 2008

Short Term Market Predictions

I agree with most of what Marc Faber says in this recent clip.

Marc Faber 21/11/08 Strong Rebound Coming: Dr. Doom
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ETnVPXudvDs


The Patriot Radio News Hour show on Friday was really good. It was just Joe doing the show (eric took the day off) so he got through a lot of news because there wasn't anyone to joke around and waste time with.

http://patriotarchives.blogspot.com/


direct link to friday's show:

http://allamericangold.com/ptg21nov08.mp3

I would with most of what this guy says in his video with respect to the markets over the next week, but this is directed only to short term traders, not long term investors.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37lsmHRtffs

I think the stock markets are in a short term bottom. It is possible this is the bottom in some foreign markets. I think oil will stop falling and remain around $50. I think there will be rallies in almost all sectors in markets around the world. There are a lot of people who are very bearish right now... lots of people saying that the DOW is going to 6400. But Jim Rogers and Marc Faber think that the markets are over sold and there will be a rally for a few months. But most people think we're still going lower. Of course no one knows for sure, but i was looking for a bottom around $50 oil, and i think we got there. I think US stocks are overvalued but oversold. I think foreign stocks are undervalued and oversold. So i think there will be big rallies in the foreign stocks. The one thing Marc Faber warned against is the possibility that some people who were seeking protection in gold, might sell their gold now to buy cheap stocks. But there's so much bullish news for gold, that i still think gold is in good shape. The Perth Mint stopped selling gold which is a pretty big deal. Also, the date where you have to state whether you want COMEX delivery is Nov. 28th, so there could be a big short covering rally coming up as all the shorts scramble to buy gold to cover physical delivery. Also, gold entered something called backwardation, which is very rare, and means that people are willing to pay more for gold in the present, than in the future. Apparently, backwardation only happens if there is a risk that the exchange will default or there will be a currency crisis. This is obviously just a guess... but I could see the DOW fall maybe 300 points on Monday, followed by a few weeks of rallying. The DOW could easily go back up to 10,000, but certainly will not make any new highs until the currency collapse occurs. Even stocks like Citigroup, could go from $4 up to $8, which would be a 100% gain... followed by a move down to $0. So I expect a lot of things to rally in the next maybe 6 weeks... i think the dollar will fall a bit... foreign stocks will have big gains... oil will remain at around $50, but some oil sector stocks may still rally. If oil goes up to $60, i think it will fall back to $50 again. I expect a huge move in the price of silver. I think gold could make a run up to $1000 before the end of the year, and silver could go up to $15, which would be a 50% increase.

The currency crisis is setting up to occur sometime in 2009. China may use its US dollar reserves to fund its stimulus plan, meaning they would become a net seller of treasuries. The OPEC countries will be struggling with the low oil price, and they may need to sell their dollar reserves to keep their economies running since they built their economies on the assumption of higher oil prices. So the Middle East could also turn into a net seller of US treasuries. And with all the spending that the US government is doing, they will be trying to sell more Treasury Bonds than ever before at a time when all their biggest customers are also trying to unload. This could bankrupt the United States, completely destroy the value of the dollar, and lead to a situation very similar to what Iceland experienced. I think the speculative trade going forward to profit from this dollar devaluation is to short the long term Treasury Bonds. I think there is a lot of smart money speculating with stocks such as TBT, which looks like it is very close to making a bottom and is a simple way for individual investors to profit from the rise in long term US bond yields. This looks like one of the last bubbles to burst. Many people made a lot of money by speculating first with the collapse of the sub prime market, then with the collapse of the financial institutions, and i think shorting the long term bonds is the next big trade, which always winds up looking obvious in hindsight.

Lindsey Williams Update

Lindsey Williams was wrong about McCain being elected as President. But he was dead right with his prediction of $50 oil. In July 2008, he was the only person I heard who thought oil was going down to $50. For those who do not believe that Lindsey Williams was telling the truth, I would ask, do you therefore believe that his $50 oil call was just a lucky guess? For decades, Lindsey Williams was warning the country about the rising cost of oil and the dependence on foreign oil. Based on what he was saying in the past, a $50 oil prediction did not make much logical sense, and Lindsey Williams agreed that this was scenario was almost unimaginable. He admitted that he would have never thought that oil could have gone down to $50 had it not been told to him from his old big-oil friend. So looking at this situation from a probability perspective, it seems very unlikely that this $50 oil prediction was just a wild guess. Based on everything that Lindsey has said in the past about a rising oil price, and given the fact that $50 oil seemed almost impossible in July 2008, I would have to conclude that this could not have been just a lucky guess. If someone had asked a variety of oil market analysts in July 2008 what they thought the probability was of oil hitting $50 over the next twelve months, many would have said it would be impossible and would likely put the odds at around 20:1. Before I heard Lindsey Williams make this prediction in July 2008, I myself would have said $50 oil would be virtually impossible. Even after I heard Lindsey Williams in early July, I still thought it was pretty unlikely. But I had thought to myself that if Lindsey Williams said it was going to happen… it could happen. If I was making odds for Las Vegas about the oil markets in July 2008, I would have put $50 oil at around 20:1 (maybe a 5% chance). But after I heard Lindsey Williams make this prediction, I would have shifted the odds up to 5:1. I still thought it was pretty unlikely, (maybe a 20% chance), but certainly a lot more likely now that Lindsey Williams said what he said. Therefore, given how accurate Lindsey Williams was in the past about the oil markets, I would assign a pretty high percentage chance that he is right about his future predictions.

Lindsey Williams – November 21st, 2008

Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=keQsan0RhFU

Part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IjveOl7qICQ

Part 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uWJw_oSx-9U


Lindsey Williams was on Alex Jones earlier this week and he told the world what will happen over the next few months. Lindsey Williams said that oil will remain around the $50 level over the next roughly six months. The plan of the elites is to hold oil at around the $50 level for many months in order to bankrupt the Middle East. This will also continue to hurt Russia and Venezuela and other oil producing countries. Therefore, for anyone considering making investments in the oil sector, there are certain things that need to be kept in mind. The first is that the price of oil is not going to go up for a little while. Therefore, there is no point in buying future contracts. I believe that we have hit the bottom in oil, but we’re not really going much higher or lower from here. I would admit that it is possible for oil to fall to $40, but I think if it does that, it will go back up to $50 again. And if oil goes up to $70, I think it will fall back down to $50 again. I think long term investors should wait a few months before buying oil futures contracts. But in terms of investing in the oil sector, there are certainly some good opportunities. The most important aspect to oil investing over the next few months is that investments should only be made into oil companies that can make a profit off of $50 oil. Stay away from the Canadian tar sands or deep water drilling projects that take $80+ oil to be profitable. But there should still be plenty of profitable oil companies with oil at $50, and I think since many of these stocks have been driven down to such low levels, there are still plenty of oil stocks that could have some nice short term gains even if the price of oil does not rise above $50 for quite some time. Many of these oil stocks pay great dividends, and since it is expected that the oil price bottoms around $50, the share prices should not continue to go down and investors can enjoy collecting huge dividends without watching the share price tumble. Anyone investing in oil should stay totally clear of the Middle East. I think that over the next few years, Russia and Indonesia will become major oil players who will challenge the Middle East for their place as the world’s major oil producers. I believe that Indonesia will provide a lot of the oil that will fuel China’s growth over the next few decades, making this the ideal area to invest in the oil sector. I am also skeptical of Canadian oil investments because I do not think that the United States will be consuming very much oil after the currency collapse. The United States will become such a wasteland, that there will be no one for the Canadian oil producers to sell to. Australia and the Scandinavian countries would be the best Western countries to make oil investments in, but the Asian countries are where the real growth will happen.

I expect the oil price to stay around $50 up until the time when the currency starts to collapse. Therefore, investing in oil is really only useful as an inflation hedge, and I think that gold and soybeans would be much more profitable inflation hedges than oil. I think that even if the US dollar index falls back towards the low 70’s, oil will probably still remain around $50. If oil does get pushed upwards by a fall in the US dollar, I expect oil prices to remain the same or even fall lower relative to other currencies. With the dollar index around 87, it is possible that the dollar can fall a lot, before it crashes. The dollar might drift lower, back down to 70 or make new lows down to 60 over the next few months. But at some point, a gradual decline could turn into a crash, and an Iceland style bankruptcy will occur.

Lindsey Williams told everyone to enjoy gasoline at the pumps under $2 per gallon, but he also warned everyone to use these next few months to prepare for the currency collapse. He explained that we will experience an Iceland style collapse in the United States. As a Canadian, I unfortunately believe that this collapse will also crush Canada and its economy. And with Mexico already essentially a third world nation, the bankruptcy of the United States and Canada will allow for a North American Union. This is all planned out by the elites, and I believe that the bankruptcy of Canada is necessary to form a North American Union. The CBC even did a made for TV movie about the North American Union called “The Trojan Horse”. It took place in the near future, after the Canadian government came to the rescue of the United States by providing drinking water and formed one country out of the crisis. Hopefully Canada will get to play the role of rescuing the United States from the crisis, rather than being in the same position, but it is likely that Canada will feel the pain of collapse in the US economy. Canada is more dependent on the United States than any other country in the world, and therefore, Canada is fixing to go down hard when the United States falls.

I think everyone in the United States should start making plans to get out of the country in the next few months. For those who decide to stay, a large supply of food, water, guns and ammo will be needed to survive the collapse. To survive the collapse from a financial perspective, investors need to own physical gold and silver, foreign stocks and foreign currencies. Gold held overseas, such as in goldmoney.com, and foreign bank accounts and stock brokers may be necessary to preserve wealth.

I was still debating with myself as to whether the dollar collapse would occur gradually over an extended period of time, with very high inflation... or if the currency would collapse virtually overnight. I believe now that the United States will experience a financial collapse similar to that of Iceland. Even though the economic collapse has already begun, I think the dumping of the dollar could destroy its value completely within a few days or weeks. I expect the dollar to stop rising, and resume its downtrend very soon, but at some point, a falling dollar will turn into a crashing dollar. We could wake up one day with the headlines reading “US Government is Bankrupt… Dollar in Free Fall, Banks and Stock Markets are Closed until Further Notice”. From this point on, panic grips the United States, there is rioting and looting in major cities around the country. Martial Law is declared and the US military (possibly alongside foreign troops) will patrol the streets, ration out food and water, confiscate guns and possibly gold. No one will be allowed to enter or leave the country though conventional modes of transportation. The United States will be fully controlled though a military dictatorship. And the worst case scenario is if the United States does not go peacefully into the night, and starts WWIII in order to maintain its status as super power. WWIII will likely involve the United States and Europe fighting against Russia and China, with the Middle East as an important battle ground because of the oil reserves. In lead up to this war, I expect the Untied States to invade Syria under humanitarian pretenses to save the poor people of Darfur. The real reason for the invasion of Darfur will be to cut off the oil supply to China. I expect the United States to invade or institute regime change in Pakistan, and possibly Iran and Myanmar.

I think the dollar collapse will happen in 2009. I think it could occur as early as January 2009. The motive for this to occur in January is so that the crisis would be totally blamed on Bush and the republicans. This way, the public would get behind Obama even more than they are now, and they will accept whatever “change” he institutes. The changes that he will make will require a certain percentage of the public to go along with his plans, which is why he is required to be loved and worshiped.

While the country was preoccupied with the election and the euphoria of a new President, the Federal Reserve and the Treasury seized power and looted the country of its wealth. They are literally creating trillions of dollars, robbing the American people, buying up assets, and consolidating power. This power will be passed onto Obama who will use it to enslave the population and lead them down the road to serfdom.

With the dollar collapse likely to occur sometime in 2009, there are a few things that will trigger this collapse. The collapse in the dollar will occur when the Federal Reserve has to monetize the debt. When other countries will not longer buy up enough Treasury bonds, they are just bought by the Federal Reserve instead, which is highly inflationary. Even though the dollar has been rising lately, a perfect storm for the collapse of the dollar is brewing. The first important factor is that the United States will be trying to sell more Treasury bonds than ever before. Obama has already stated that he will basically spend money without limit or concern of deficits. This means that there will be more debt than ever before for foreign nations to buy. With the economic crisis hurting all countries around the world right now, there is a lot less money available to buy up all the debt. China has recently announced a massive stimulus package and there is speculation that China might use its US dollar reserves to fund the expenditures. This would turn China, the biggest buyers of US Treasuries, into a net seller. On top of that, OPEC nations used to spend their excess oil revenues on buying up US debt. But with oil at $50, Middle Eastern countries will also turn into net sellers of US debt because they will need the extra revenue to fund their social programs since they built their economies on the assumption of high oil prices. And if Japan follows in the lead of China, it is possible that there will be a flood of US government debt onto the world markets, and no one will want to buy it. The Federal Reserve, as buyer of last resort, will monetize the debt and the value of the dollar will collapse. If all OPEC countries, as well as China, decide to dump dollars at a time when the US Government is trying to sell more dollars than ever before, the dollar will collapse virtually over night.

Lindsey Williams – The Next 12 Months – Recorded June, 2008

Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CApz4VGc31g

Part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kNrFV82zg3I

Part 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fyw0AVJrFKU

Part 4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AMUcVfz3C1w

Part 5
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KFFZd9ntph8

Part 6
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQBz0Fl1LtM

Part 7
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ociO8TtEXnQ

Tuesday, November 4, 2008

The Reason “They” Will Choose McCain

Barack Hussein Obama and John McCain have very little fundamental difference in their core platforms. McCain wants to continue big government. Obama wants an even bigger role for government. McCain wants to say in Iraq for 100 years. Obama has backed away from his earlier anti-war position and has pledged to strengthen the occupation in Afghanistan and supports intervention in Georgia while talking tough to others in the region. Both candidates support the same foreign and monetary policy, and the only candidate who offered real change was Ron Paul. So no matter which candidate is elected, the policies that the United States will take over the next four years will be the same for all intents and purposes.

The elections in the United States are rigged. The American people are given the choice between two identical political philosophies. Both candidates are chosen by an elite group of globalists and proceed to entertain the public with their political puppet show in a scheme to divide the country and pit Left vs. Right (Democrat vs. Republican). Despite the fact that both candidates are chosen by this small group of elites, the winner between the two is also decided by this same group. They follow an agenda in order to continue the false left vs. right paradigm and maintain control of the political system by giving the public the illusion of choice and democracy.

We can look no further than the 2000 and 2004 election to find blatant evidence of voter fraud. In the Bush vs. Gore election, it was only necessary to rig the results in one state in order to influence the entire election. The powers that be have succeeded in effectively dividing the population almost down the middle so that the split between democrats and republicans is almost 50/50. Therefore, to influence the results of an election, voter fraud is only necessary in one important state because the outcome in certain states will decide the election for the whole country. In 2000, Bush only won the election because of clear voter fraud in Florida. There was blatant discrimination against African Americans, countless issues with the ballets, and just an unbelievable series of events that lead to Bush winning the state’s electoral votes. Of course, with his brother as Governor of that state, that should have made the fraud a lot easier to commit. In Ohio in 2004, the evidence of fraud is less blatant, but the discrepancies were even greater. The results from the electronic voting machines clearly did not match up with the exit polls, when usually exit polling data can be quite reliable and does not deviate much from the true results. Even though Bush and Kerry were both members of the exclusive Yale secrete society Skull and Bones, the election was rigged anyways. But it is important to realize that this is not a republican conspiracy against the democrats… it is an agenda by the elites against the American people.

I am confident that John McCain will be elected tonight because I believe what Lindsey Williams said to be true, and given that information, I can understand why “John McCain is their man.” Even though there is no real difference between the candidates, the public perceives them to have very different platforms and ideologies. The perceived difference has totally divided the country, even though everyone is just essentially supporting the same system. The danger that the elite want to avoid is having the American people turn away from the both parties and rejecting the whole political system entirely. As long as they can keep the left wing supporting the democrats and the right wing supporting the republicans, they can have full control of the country. The left will fight the right in order to get the democrats in power, and the right will fight the left in order to get the republicans in power. The left and right need to stop fighting each other, and instead start fighting together against the phony two party system. It is only when the left wing rejects the democrats and the right wing reject the republicans can we move back towards limited government and personal freedom and have this political machine dismantled.

I think most Republican supporters are already aware that their party has failed them. Most recognize that Bush was a horrible President who put the country in a horrible economic situation and screwed up the Iraq War. However, I feel that many traditional republicans will still vote for McCain because they are justifiably afraid of the socialism that Obama represents. Also, there is still plenty of racism present in the United States and certainly a decent percentage of white Americans will vote for the white guy so that the black guy does not get into power.

The Democrats blame the economic problems and the failed Iraq war on the Bush Administration and believe that the Democratic Party will make things better again. Unfortunately, since most Obama supporters do not truly understand the nature of the problem, they do not realize that the solutions that Obama provides will make the economic situation worse. The left wing blames free market capitalism for the economic crisis and believes that government intervention is the solution. The left tends to blame Wall St. rather than the Federal Reserve. The government and the private sector work together in a fascist relationship to take advantage of the American people, but the people need to realize that it is the government part of that equation that needs to be eliminated, not the other way around. The economic crisis was caused by government intervention, and it is the free market that is trying to fix the imbalances. Businesses that only succeeded because of government handouts and favors need to fail, insolvent companies need to go bankrupt, and incompetent management needs to be fired and have the assets bought up by the competent. The recent government intervention is simply making the underlying problem worse and further intervention by the future administration will just dig us into a deeper hole.

The next four years are going to be horrible in the United States. The economic collapse that started in late 2007, and accelerated in the Spring of 2008, will unfold between 2009 – 2012 plunging the country into the worst economic depression in the country’s history. The economic collapse has only just begun and the dollar crisis is still to come. When the dollar starts to fall and eventually hyperinflates, that is when the real disaster begins and when truly tough times will be upon us.

If Obama is elected now, the left wing will realize that the socialist solutions did not work, and actually made the problem worse. By 2012, the American people would be so outraged with both political parties that they might get behind a Ron Paul type candidate and bring about the necessary reform to get the country back on sound footing. The elites are afraid of this and need the public to support either republicans or democrats.

Since both McCain and Bush are both perceived to be free market oriented (even though they are not) capitalism will take the blame for the collapse and the public will demand big government socialism to protect them. Therefore, I think that McCain will win this election in a very close race and the left wing support of the democrats will be emboldened as the crisis unfolds. It will appear as if the economic problems started with Bush in 2000 and got worse under McCain, before hitting rock bottom in 2012. Then, in 2012, the democrats will win in a landslide and install a massive socialist government that will seize whatever power is left for the taking and eliminate any glimmer of freedom from this once bright beacon.

Since the majority of the economic collapse has not yet unfolded, I believe it is better from the perspective of the elites to have McCain in power so that the free market can take the blame and strengthen control for the democrats in 2012. If Obama wins, the elite run the danger of a revolution where both parties are rejected since both would be to blame for the economic collapse. No matter who wins tonight, they will eventually be hated by both the left and the right by 2012. So if Obama wins, everyone in America will hate Obama and the democrats, and it is unlikely that they will find much comfort in the republicans since everyone realizes that it was republicans who got us into this mess. But if McCain wins, the left and right will both hate the republicans and will flock to the democrats in 2012. The elites want the public to run to socialism, not freedom, and with McCain in the white house, they can keep the left vs. right paradigm alive and well.

When McCain wins, Obama supporters will be furious. I would expect some form of civil unrest to occur. Over the next four years, there will undoubtedly be plenty of civil unrest which will justify a police state to strengthen the stranglehold that the government has over its people. The plans for martial law are already in the books. The elites may actually welcome or incite civil unrest in order to justify martial law and grab more power.

The elites do not care if the public protests against one political party, as long as they are in favor of the other one. It is acceptable for the public to hate the republicans provided that they support the democrats. So if the elites put the democrats in now, the whole country will end up hating both parties, whereas if they keep a republican president in office, the public will hate the republicans, but believe that the democrats will be their saviors.

Friday, October 24, 2008

Calling the Bottom at $50 Oil


With oil, gold, commodities and stocks all falling, many investors are wondering where the bottom in these markets will be. I think we are very close. These assets cannot fall forever, even though it seems like there is no end in sight. There are incredible bargains out there already, but many of these assets (despite already being under valued) continue to fall. Holding cash (and in particular the US dollar) has been the best place to put money for the last few months, but I expect this to change very soon. Cash buys a lot more today that it did a few months ago since many investors exited their positions and ran into cash and bonds. This was in large part due to the spectacular rally in the US dollar, fueled by fears of deflation. My prediction is that when oil approaches $50 a barrel, the deflationary mindset will change to one of inflation. Investor sentiment can change on a dime and have profound and immediate effects. At one time, everyone thought buying sub-prime mortgages was the best thing since sliced bread, and another day, investors all tried to exit their positions in these toxic assets. Those who were unable to get out near the top quickly found the market to be illiquid and discovered that they could only receive pennies on the dollar for what was very recently a highly coveted asset.

Inflation will return with a vengeance and drive up commodities, oil and gold, followed even by nominal gains in stock markets around the world. People have been rushing into dollars for the past couple months, but I think this trend will reverse very soon and everyone will be running away from the dollar and other cash positions in a rush to own real assets.

I think the US dollar will find a top when oil falls to around $50. When this happens, OPEC countries will suffer significant pain since their revenue is totally dependent on high oil prices. Oil prices at these levels will virtually bankrupt many OPEC countries and most will no longer have the money to continue to buy US debt. In fact, OPEC countries will actually have to sell their dollar reserves in order to finance government expenditure as their oil revenues decline. As OPEC countries start selling their dollar reserves, the dollar will fall sharply and eventually collapse completely. I do not know how quickly the decline in the dollar will occur, but I suspect that the fall could be even faster than its recent assent.

Investors with cash on the sideline need to start making plans immediately to get rid of any US dollars and US dollar denominated assets they are holding. As oil drops below $60, investors should start spending their fiat currency (especially US dollars) on these undervalued assets. By the time oil drops below $55 everyone should be almost fully invested. And if oil falls to $50 or below, it is time to back the truck up. It is not certain that oil will fall to exactly $50 a barrel because it might only fall to $53, or go lower to $47, but I predict the bottom will occur somewhere around the $50 level. Therefore, I do not recommend that anyone try to time things exactly perfectly, or to buy in at the exact bottom. Investors who try to time the bottom perfectly may end up being too late and will be stuck trying to get rid of their dollars after the mindset has already changed. The important thing is to get out of dollars before the mindset changes from deflation to inflation, since it will be much more difficult to buy into hard assets at a time when there could be a run on the dollar.

There appears to be many traders who are also betting on $50 oil as oil options soared after the OPEC cut failed to support prices.

Bloomberg: Oil Options at $50 Soar After OPEC Cut Fails to Support Prices. October 24th, 2008.

What will ultimately push oil down close to $50? Just pick an event. It could be further weakness in stock markets or continued deterioration in the global economy. Anything that would continue to show slower global economic growth or deflation will continue to push prices down. An economic or political crisis may erupt that would suggest less demand for oil, pushing the price down. So even though I am pretty sure that oil will bottom around $50, it is not guaranteed that gold will be dragged down also. Depending on what event pushes oil lower, gold may rise as oil falls. A crisis that would push oil lower could simultaneous push gold higher since gold traditionally rises in a crisis situation. The gold market is also very small and there is a lot of demand, therefore it is possible we have already seen the bottom in gold. There is so much demand for gold that all the buying should support prices to some degree. Gold could act as the canary in the coal mine as prices may rise in anticipation of what is to come and start blazing a trail that other commodities will eventually follow. Stock markets will probably bottom when oil reaches $50, whereas this is not necessarily the case for gold. When investors put their cash to work, they should first buy gold, then silver, then foreign stocks, and then oil. Investors not already holding gold should purchase some immediately, and then enter the stock markets as oil falls below $60, and finally the oil sector when oil falls below $55. Then sit back, buckle your seat belts, and prepare for a bumpy ride.

Investors should load up on physical gold and silver, (and maybe platinum and palladium as well), gold mining stocks, oil and oil sector stocks, agriculture, other commodities and foreign currencies. The large gold mining stocks will be the first to move up, followed by spectacular moves up in junior gold miners with defined deposits as money rushes into the ground. Foreign stocks in Asia that trade at low P/E ratios and pay huge dividends are ideal. Stay away from any investment in the Middle East and focus on counties like Australia, Canada, Brazil, Russia, Indonesia or Norway for energy stocks. Oil stocks in a country like Australia may be preferable to oil stocks in Canada because Australia will be selling their oil to richer Asian counties whereas Canada sells most of their oil to poor Americans. With the low value of the Australian dollar, foreign investors should get a lot of bang for their buck with many of these Australian investments. I also think that agriculture stocks in New Zealand look very attractive because they provide exposure to the Asian markets while still being a modern industrialized western nation where investors may feel more comfortable.

To all of those who thought that the economic crisis got bad during September and October… you ain’t seen nothing yet. The events that have occurred in the last two months were not the crisis; they were the lead up to the real crisis. The real crisis begins when the dollar starts to fall, and this is a crisis that cannot be solved by the Federal Reserve and the Treasury printing up more money. The current actions that have been taken to postpone the crisis will soon accelerate the crisis if policy remains unchanged. With everyone in the media talking about deflation, the inflation will take everyone by surprise causing a mass exodus from the US dollar and into traditional inflation hedges like gold and commodities.

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

The Two Dumbest Guys in America Who Got it Right


Patriot Radio News Hour - Wednesday, October 22nd, 2008

Archived Shows

I've been listening to the Patriot Radio News Hour since the start of the year. They are self procliamed right-wing wacko extremists who do a radio show out of beautiful vacant Dear Valley Arizona. They have been selling gold to the American people for the last decade, warning anyone who will listen that the financial collapse was coming. These guys do not have fancy University degrees or experience in the financial community, yet they somehow knew what the best and brightest could not understand.

When I first started listening to their show, I felt that they were a little over the top, and were overstating the dangers in the economy in order to sell more gold. But I kept listening to them none the less because they were hilarious and they provided a lot of economic news that the mainstream media conveniently would fail to mention. But after listening for a few weeks, I realized that these guys were not as crazy as they sounded. I discovered that almost everything they were saying was correct, and I have watched the economy collapse exactly the way they said it would. They deserve a lot of credit for getting everything right at a time when almost everyone else got it wrong. I listen to their show everyday because they are the only people who really understand the Government's agenda and what is really occurring in the economy. If you have never listened to their show, I would encourage everyone to put on their tinfoil hat and listen to today's show.

Bank of Canada Cuts Rates as Canadian Dollar Tumbles


Even though the Canadian dollar has been in freefall this month, the Bank of Canada decided to cut rates by a quarter of a point on Tuesday, October 21st, 2008. Since many had speculated that rates would have been cut by fifty basis points, the Bank of Canada is now able to claim to be more hawkish on inflationary pressures by only cutting 0.25%. The justification many have given is that it gives them more room to make further cuts in the future. But with the Canadian dollar in free fall, is it responsible to be setting rates at 2.25%?

Canada has one of the lowest interest rates in the world.

One American dollar currently buys $1.25 Canadian dollars. And one Canadian dollar only buys 80 American cents. Only a few months ago, the currencies were hovering around par. A graph of the Canadian dollar versus the US dollar over the last year illustrates the steep decline.

Canadian Dollar vs. US Dollar


To be fair, the US dollar has been strong against most currencies as of late, but the Canadian dollar has been very weak against many other currencies as well this past year.

Canadian Dollar vs. Euro

Canadian Dollar vs. Japanese Yen

Canadian Dollar vs. Swiss Franc


Canadian Dollar vs. Singapore Dollar

Canadian Dollar vs. Chinese Yuan

Even with the price of gold falling below $750 US, gold remains above $900 Canadian.

To find the price of gold in Canadian dollars:

Click Here for the American Dollar spot price of gold.

Click Here for the currency converter.

How much more can the Canadian dollar fall against other major currencies? Unfortunately, the Canadian dollar can fall a lot more. Canada is a commodity rich country, meaning that our dollar tends to trade in line with commodity prices. With lower commodity prices, especially with oil trading below $70 a barrel, the fundamentals of the Canadian dollar are very weak at the moment. From a macro perspective, the country is entering a recession and our housing bubble is in the early stages of deflating. Enormous unfunded liabilities, mostly retirement payments and medical care costs for retiring baby boomers, are coming due over the next two decades. Artificially low interest rates have expanded the supply of money and credit, which dilutes the value of the currency.

To see where the Canadian dollar might be headed, we can look at how the currencies of similar countries are performing. Most people would consider Australia to be the country most like Canada. Our two countries and economies are similar in many respects. The Australian dollar was nearly at par with the American dollar this past July, but has since fallen even more than the Canadian dollar to under 70 American cents.

Australian Dollar vs. US Dollar

If the Canadian government and Bank of Canada want to stop the steep decline in our dollar, monetary policy will have to be tightened by dramatically raising interest rates. This will have the effect of curtailing reckless borrowing and spending and encourage Canadians to replenish their savings. This course of action will bring about a much needed recession that will purge the imbalances in our economy that have been built into the system over the last decade. When Central Banks, like the Bank of Canada, set interest rates at an artificially low level, capital is inefficiently allocated and malinvestments are made. The misallocation of capital is not the fault of the free market or entrepreneurs; it is caused by the Central Bank artificially setting interest rates below the free market level. As the Canadian economy continues to deteriorate, the free market will most likely take the blame for the crisis and the government will interfere even more in the economy to try to fix the problem that they themselves created.

Money is the most important aspect of any economy and therefore when central economic planners at the central bank tinker with the system by fixing the rate of interest, the free market is not able to function properly. This is not because of an inherent flaw in the free market system, rather it is government interference in the market that screws everything up and creates the booms and busts. Once a boom has been created, a bust is inevitable. Attempting to keep the economy in the boom phase is impossible after it begins to turn to a bust. Attempts to keep the boom going are futile and come at the expense of currency devaluation like we are experiencing now. Capitalism cannot be blamed for current and future economic problems because true free market capitalism cannot exist when interest rates are arbitrarily set by central economic planners meddling in the economy. If we do not change course, imbalances will continue to grow within the economy and the recession will ultimately turn into an inflationary depression. If fiscal and monetary policy remain unchanged after entering an inflationary depression, a hyperinflationary blow out and complete economic collapse will follow.

There are big problems in Canada. These problems were created by government and central banks and the solutions they provide to the problems they created will make everything a lot worse. Government can only make the situation better by doing less, not more. They can help the economy by eliminating previous legislation and regulations rather than creating new ones.

There is a housing bubble in Canada that has recently started to deflate. The excess of credit that was pumped into the system while savings were falling. fueled a speculative housing bubble and allowed debt to expand to unserviceable levels. Even though I do not think the problems we face in Canada are as severe as in the United States, we none the less face many of the same issues. Canadians who believe that housing prices cannot fall dramatically can simply look to our neighbours to the south where prices in many areas have totally collapsed. The recent fall in the value of the Canadian dollar caused an equal fall in the value of Canadian houses. The fact that our currency got devalued, made all assets priced our currency less valuable. When a house, bank account, or income is priced in a foreign currency, a substantial amount of wealth is actually realized to have been destroyed. And if the Canadian dollar stays this lower or heads lower, the present value of future earnings just got hammered.

Canadians are not able to afford these expensive house prices since on average we do not have enough savings or high enough incomes to justify these outrageous prices. This temporary increase in the value of houses allowed the government to charge higher property taxes and received more though sales taxes from the excess spending generated from the increased debt that went along with the illusion of wealth. The increase in government revenue was not saved for the future, rather it was spent on current government expenditure. Even though the government took in huge taxes from baby boomers over the boom years, the government still spent more than it taxed and has accumulated massive unfunded liabilities that will be impossible for this younger generation to pay. The government should have been saving some of the tax money that they collected from the baby boomers in order to fund the retirement that they promised they would provide. Instead of this, the government did not save anything, and actually spent more than they took in and promised more than they could deliver.

How did Canadians get into this mess? Canadians trusted that their government would take care of them and they believed the promises made by politicians that they could improve the general quality of life without requiring hard work and sacrifice. The politicians who got elected were the politicians who promised the most benefits to special interest groups. Parents will vote for a candidate who promises to fund public schools while lowering taxes on middle income families. Elderly and retired people will vote for a candidate who promises better health care and retirement benefits while increasing taxes on the working class. Poor people will vote for the candidate who promises the biggest welfare checks and social safety nets while taxing everyone who produces the wealth they are stealing. With candidates trying to please all the special interest groups, they end up promising everyone that they will be able to make their lives better without making anyone else worse off. The more money that government spends is more money that they waste and Canadians would be a lot better off without this massive government trying to run the economy and take care of everyone.

We live in a globalized world, and the value of the currency of a country is vitally important to the health of the economy and the prosperity of the people. Constant currency devaluation will always lead to higher domestic prices in the future. Those who claim that a weaker currency will not cause domestic prices to rise are dead wrong. Canadians import most of their consumer products from abroad, so most of those prices will certainly go up. Domestically produced products will not rise as dramatically because the labour costs to produce those products fell in tandem with the currency. Producing cheaper goods by devaluing the salaries of the workers is not an ideal way to build a prosperous economy. It was Henry Ford, who once owned a great car company, who realized that by paying his workers a high enough salary, they could afford to buy the products that they themselves produced. But even though labour costs have fallen due to the depreciated currency, the capital costs have remained the same. In a global market, it makes no difference what the nominal price of a barrel of oil costs in any one domestic currency, because the price is determined at a global level. Even though oil fell below $70 US per barrel, the price of oil in Canadian dollars is still above $80. Therefore, if a Canadian farmer is competing with an American farmer, the currency devaluation has certain effects. The currency devaluation does not affect the price of the final product produced. If both farmers grow wheat, the price of wheat is determined at a global level and both farmers will get an equal amount of money for their product. So currency devaluation will not affect the real revue received by the farmers. The Canadian farmer will receive increased nominal revenue, but no increase in real revenue. The Canadian farmer will have no change in nominal labour costs, but will have lower real labour costs. And the Canadian farmer will have increased nominal capital costs, but no real increase in capital costs. Therefore, the profits for the farmer come only at the expense of cheaper labourers , since the increased nominal revenue is somewhat offset by the increased nominal capital costs. So even though the Canadian farmer receives more Canadian dollars for his harvest while leaving his nominal labour costs unchanged, the farmer is forced to pay higher capital costs (such as oil). Canadian consumers are stuck paying higher prices for domestically produced products without seeing an increase in their wages.

However, if a company uses skilled labour, these businesses will have to increase labour costs at close to the same rate as the currency devaluation. If the wages of a skilled labourer decrease because of currency devaluation, they are free to obtain a similar job in a foreign country that is able to pay a higher wage. The price of skilled labour can be looked at as a global good with a set world price for skills that are in demand. Therefore, businesses will have to pay a higher nominal price for skilled labourers which reduces the increased in profits. Given this fact, it is the poor unskilled workers who suffer the most from inflation, since their wages do not need to be increased, meanwhile, prices for necessary global goods are increasing.

Businesses that derive their revenue stream from within Canada (typically service industries) are at a particular disadvantage. Even though these businesses receive the same lower real cost of labour, they also receive lower real revenue streams. Their nominal revenues and labour should remain the same. If anything, their domestic revenue streams are actually likely to decrease in nominal terms also as people are forced to spend more money on necessary global goods that have all risen in price, leaving less money to spend on discretionary products and services. Increases in capital costs affect these businesses in the same way as the exporters, yet they do not receive the same increase in nominal revenue to offset the increase in capital costs. Therefore profits for domestic service industries, which compete for capital goods on the global market, will face increased costs and decreased profit margins, at a time when the domestic demand is falling. Service sector industries are then faced the situation of wanting to lower prices to attract more demand and wanting to raise prices to offset the increase in capital costs.

A devalued currency increases exports, which benefits those who export domestic products. The majority of the population in the country does not benefit from a devalued currency. Exports are increased for two main reasons. The first reason is that the labour costs went down which increases their competitiveness though lower costs. And secondly, Canadians are now a lot poorer and are therefore unable to afford to consume as many domestically produced goods, requiring them to be exported. So is increasing exports really all that good for society if it comes at the costs of lowering wages resulting in everyone being too poor to buy the goods that they produced?

China has a lot of exports because they devalued their currency, and their economy is growing rapidly. But since the currency is intentionally devalued by their communist government, the Chinese people do not get to enjoy consuming the goods they produce. As a result, a lot of the population in China has to work very hard producing many products, but they tragically put them all on ships and send them around the world to countries that have stronger currencies. A devalued currency results in a nation of slaves who produce goods that they cannot afford to consume. The notion that a devalued currency is somehow a good thing is preposterous. It benefits a few people at the expense of many. It steals wealth from those who have saved and gives to those who have borrowed. If a Canadian saved dollars in a bank account, from the perspective of everyone else in the world, that person just got about 10% - 20% poorer over the last year. However, if a Canadian had debt in Canadian dollars, from the perspective of the rest of the world, the debt burden just got reduced. And since the federal government is in the most debt out of anyone, they are able to create money and credit out of thin air, which devalues the currency, and allows them to repay their debt in depreciated currency that they counterfeited. When Canadians receive these debt payments in the form of government pensions, the retired population will be outraged that the checks they receive do not buy anything. Even those that are “inflation adjusted” will not keep up with prices since government numbers understate real world inflation.

The Canadian government needs to stop the madness that they created. Houses, condominiums and apartments are still being constructed because banks are still loaning out money to fund these construction projects. And since the banks are giving out credit that they got from the counterfeited money they received from the Central Bank, rather than true savings, that money will inevitably be malinvested. Credit can only be created though real savings. Savings can only be created by under consumption, where people spend less money than they make. Trying to create credit without savings will only lead to inflation and greater imbalances in the economy. This course of action makes things better in the short run, but ultimately makes things much worse in the long run. Lowering interest rates to prevent a recession will only postpone the underlying problems and does nothing to solve them.

The Bank of Canada (unlike the Federal Reserve) still publishes the M3 money supply which is the broadest measure of the amount of Canadian dollars in existence. In August 2007, the M3 money supply was approximately $1,142,475,000,000 or about $1.14 trillion. In August 2008, the M3 money supply was approximately $1,277,530,000,000 or $1.28 trillion. The money supply increased by over 11% in one year, meaning that there are 11% more Canadian dollars than there were last year. Is it any surprise that the value of our money is going down and prices are going up when money is being created at this pace?

Tuesday, October 21, 2008

Gold is Not Falling… The US Dollar is Rising


Gold fell below $770 US in trading today as the US dollar index surged above 83. As a Canadian investor, the drop in the gold price today was not very significant measured in Canadian dollars. Gold is still well above $900 in Canadian dollars, and the fall to around $770 US, only pushed gold down slightly to around $930 Canadian. As long as gold falls only when the dollar rises, foreign investors should experience very little fluctuation in the price movement. Until gold falls below $900 and $850 in Canadian dollars, I do not think that it is fair to claim that the value of gold is actually falling.

It is far more accurate to look at the price of gold, not as fundamental weakness in the metal, but as artificial and temporary strength in the dollar. At some point, the dollar will turn around and start to fall against all the major foreign currencies and the decline could be faster than the assent. The rise in the value of the dollar can only be explained through deleveraging, a misguided flight to “quality”, or the last remaining bubble yet to burst. With ridiculously low yields on treasury bonds, and Helicopter Ben making frequent money drops, the dollar in the long run will likely be one of the worst positions to hold. The current strength in the dollar can disappear as quickly as the dot-com stocks of the late 1990’s, or the inflated housing prices that existed throughout most of the United States. Even though the rise in the dot-com stocks and housing prices were equally as irrational as the current rise in the dollar, the increases happened none the less. Rational investors who looked at the insane price valuations of these assets were shocked at how high these prices went, when the fundamentals kept getting worse. The same can be said for the current rise in the dollar. I am surprised by the current strength in the dollar, in the same way that many were surprised at the high prices of dot-com stocks and houses.

It is important to recognize that the rise in the dollar is temporary. How high the dollar could go in anyone’s guess. Earlier this year, I would have never dreamed the US dollar would ever get back up this high to begin with. I think if people really understood what was occurring, no one would want to hold dollars. But the vast majority of investors have no clue what is happening to the economy and are buying up dollars, just as many were buying up dot-com stocks and mortgage backed securities at one time. Anyone who followed the herd in the past got burned when the bubble finally popped, so investors must resist the temptation to jump on board with the rising dollar. At some point, the dollar bubble will burst. I predict that the US dollar index will break below 70 sometime in 2009, which will be followed by a very steep decline, as the dollar enters new territory on the dollar index, without any support below.

In the mean time, investors holding US dollars should be thrilled at the artificial and temporary purchasing power their greenback provides. This phony rise in the US dollar is allowing holders of US dollars to purchases assets, such as gold, at a big discount. It is impossible to call the top in the dollar, and therefore impossible to call the bottom in gold, but I would encourage any investors who are still holding onto dollars to start looking at the types of assets they would like to buy. When the dollar turns around to head lower, the decline could be swift, so investors will have to be ready to dump their dollars at the first sign of trouble in order to get out ahead of the masses. Holding onto dollars is very dangerous, since dollars can be dumped in overseas markets. Investors do not want to wake up one morning to find out that the dollar lost its phony purchasing power while they were sleeping.

When the dollar bubble bursts, the dollar index will fall and gold will rise. Investors who manage to buy cheap gold with their expensive US dollars before this turning point will experience incredible profits while the majority of Americans discover that their money no longer buys anything.

Monday, October 20, 2008

How to Fly a Money Helicopter


Free market forces are causing credit to contract in an attempt to reign in years of excess borrowing and spending, purge malinvestment and liquidate bad debt so that the economy will be cleansed of these imbalances. Even though this would be a painful process, resulting in a sharp recession, it is ultimately preferable to government’s alternative. If the government would stay out of the way and allow and allow the free market to work, the recession would be brief and America would regain its economic strength on sound footing, allowing for real economic growth to take place. However, the government is telling voters that by interviewing in the economy, the government will be able to prevent the recession from happening. The government is correct that this course of action will prevent a recession, but only at the cost of causing a much longer and harsher inflationary depression. Choosing between a recession and a depression is like trying to choose between the lesser of two evils (a lot like the current presidential election). Even though both choices are bad and will cause significant suffering, a short recession is far more favourable. But politicians do not want to be accused of doing nothing while their constituents suffer, so they will take action that ensures the suffering lasts a lot longer than it has too.

Bernanke is trying to fight the free market forces that are causing credit to contract and is attempting to reinflate the bubble by printing money. He is touted as a student of the Great Depression and is under the false belief that a contracting money supply is what caused the Great Depression, when in fact, it was the expantion of the money supply during the 1920's that ultimately lead to the bust. Bernanke will therefore battle the credit crunch by finding ways to increase the supply of money and credit to get Americans to continue to borrow and consume. There is an incredible amount of liquidity (inflation) being pumped into the system in order to try to keep the boom going. The US government even resorted to mailing out $160 billion worth of checks a few months back and now has plans to mail out an even bigger one. These types of policies are wildly inflationary and fit the definition of a helicopter drop. Continued helicopter drops will eventually lead to hyperinflation, which seems to be the road that Bernake and Paulson are leading us down.

So if money printing and helicopter drops are designed to keep the phony borrow and spend economy going, there are much more effective ways to do this. To really get the credit flowing that will result in the spending that drives the GDP figures, the government needs control of the credit card companies.

Credit cards are what enabled the reckless consumption that drove the consumer economy. And the illusion of home equity allowed banks to lend money to bankrupt individuals who were then able to pay off their credit cards with home equity loans. Now that there is no more home equity to extract, credit card bills cannot be paid, causing credit card companies to reduce spending limits or cut off service to risky customers, leaving the consumer with no where else to turn to borrow money. The credit card is the last line of defense for Americans and many are simply running their cards to the limit in order to maintain their lifestyles. When the credit cards get cut off, Americans will no longer be able to consume anymore and the majority of the consumer spending based economy will collapse. Even though consumption in the United States has already fallen dramatically, I believe that most of the remaining consumption is only made possible through credit cards.

As more and more people default on their credit card loans, the credit card companies will eventually go bankrupt. The scary thing about credit card default is that people are defaulting on the minimum payment. Credit card debt can be enormous, but the monthly payments may be very small in comparison. Therefore, when people default, it is not because they are unable to pay back the full balance, it is because they are unable to pay back only a small fraction of their total debt. This will translate into enormous losses for the credit card companies which should push most of them into bankruptcy. If credit card companies actually tried to collect payment on the full amount that they were owed, virtually no one would be able to pay back the full balance within a short time period. As credit card debt compounds with interest, it is unlikely that Americans would ever be able to completely pay off their credit cards and so they simply continue to run up more debt until minimum payments cannot be made.

If the government wants to keep the helicopter flying and continue to fight the credit crunch, the government should take control of all the credit card companies. Politicians can sell this plan to the public by blaming the greedy credit card companies for charging too much interest and requiring unreasonable monthly payments. The next President could explain that the government action would lower the interest rate and monthly payments, allowing struggling families to get more time to get back on their feet, and reduce the anxiety of trying to make these payments every month. It should be easy to convince the public to support this plan because everyone hates credit card companies and the plan can be packaged in a way that makes it seem that government is protecting the public from the evil corporations that are destroying American families.

Once the government has control of all the credit cards and all the credit card debt that is attached to it, they can consolidate all this debt, which is now owed to the federal government. The government will then reduce the monthly payments to something very affordable. The government then sends everyone a new government credit card with a very high limit, low interest rates, and low monthly payments. People are then free to use this new credit card to pay the monthly payments of their previously consolidated debt, as well as use the card for new spending. A second credit card is then sent to everyone, which also has a very low monthly payment. The second card is used to pay the minimum monthly payments on the first card.

Example: Joe the Plumber and his family have a total of $100,000 of credit card debt. His combine monthly payments have reached $2000 a month. Times just keep getting tougher for Joe ever since he was fired from his job for not having the proper certification. Joe cannot afford to make these minimum monthly payments and has no money or credit that he can spend to put food on the table. The government then comes to the rescues of Joe the Plumber! The government buys up all his bad debt, bailing out the lenders who made the bad loans, and reduce his monthly payments to only $200 a month. The government then gives Joe his two new credit cards. After he gets this new credit card, he uses it to pay off his first $200 payment on his old debt, and then goes out and spends $4800 over the course of the month. So he still owes $200 per month on his old debt, and has now accumulated $5000 of new debt on the first credit card. The bill for his new credit card comes and he finds out that he owes a minimum of $10 for this month on his $5000 balance, which he can pay using his second government credit card.

With low interest rates and small monthly payments, people can continue to pay off credit card debt, with more credit card debt. And as long as limits are continually increased, people can keep spending money into the economy virtually without limit.

With government book keeping, it would appear Joe the Plumber is a very low credit risk because he is always making his minimum payments on time. Therefore, it is justified to increase his line of credit, because he has been so responsible with making his payments. And as the interest on the principle increases, the government can actually claim to have made a profit. The debt can be packaged up with a full guarantee of the government and sold aboard. These securities could have very high yields because it is possible to allow for the interest on the principle debt to be high, as long as minimum payments are low. And even though it is impossible to repay the principle without going into more debt, the value of the security will increase at the rate of interest on the principle. There will be no risk of default, since Americans can always pay the minimum payment with a new credit card, and foreigners would prefer these securitized assets to treasuries because they are backed by the government and pay a higher yield.

The problem with this plan is that when people figure out that they can spend unlimited amounts of money then everyone will go out and spend as much as possible. Therefore, the government will have to ensure that a small percentage default in order to prevent reckless spending. If people realize they can spend a reasonable amount of money for the foreseeable future, they will have an incentive to not run their cards up to the limit. The government could fix the default rate at 2%, and therefore the most reckless two percent of the population will go broke and no longer qualify for the government credit cards. People will realize that if they run up more debt than their neighbour, they could be out on the street. This way, everyone will spend relatively similar amounts, and only those who spend to excess will be eliminated from the program. But because the 2% of the population that will be defaulting will likely be poor minorities, there will be plenty of sympathy to help them through government welfare. So if people cannot be responsible to spend within their limits using the government credit cards, the government will regulate how much they can spend by adjusting the value of the welfare check they receive.

Sunday, October 19, 2008

Marc Faber – Current Views on the Economy and What to Expect in the Future


Marc Faber Interviewed at Slovenia Resource Conference (04:21) [October 11th, 2008]

Marc Faber Interviewed by CNBC (03:26) [March 18th, 2008]

Marc Faber Interview [October 14th, 2008]
Part 1 (07:05)

Part 2 (07:05)

Marc Faber Lecture at Slovenia Resource Conference [October 11th, 2008]
Part 1

Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
Part 5
Part 6
Part 7
Part 8

The lecture given by Marc Faber at the Slovenia Resource Conference was very helpful in explaining the current economic situation and what is to be expected in the future. I would encourage anyone who wants to see some clear information and coherent analysis, to watch the recently uploaded videos of the lecture on youtube I posted above.

Similar sentiment was echoed by Puru Saxena in his recent commentary.


His suspicion is that the dollar will continue to strengthen in the short run, and gold could drop to $700 or even $600 an ounce. There are two factors that he suggests that could push gold lower in the next few months. The first is that further deleveraging will continue to force selling and drive all asset prices down further. Secondly, is the possibility that the market has made a short term bottom, the economy starts showing signs of recovering and markets will rebound, shifting the mainstream perception to thinking that the worst is over, and there is no need to own gold. He has compared the current period to that of after the crash of 1929, where stocks were oversold, and rallied back over 50% (but did not make new highs) before ultimately turning around to make new lows as the country entered depression. He expects markets to make this short term bottom sometime in October or November of this year, allowing for the possibility that this low has already been reached, and markets will regain some of their losses in the next few months.

Long term however, Faber is very bullish on gold, as he recognizes that Ben Bernanke is a money printer, who is destine to send the price of gold much higher as the dollar is debased. He expects gold to outperform the stock markets, and also predicts a one to one ratio of the Dow Jones to gold in a few years. He is predicting the bankruptcy of the US government and the devaluation and possible destruction of all fiat currencies sometime down the line.

Even though I recognize the possibility that gold will fall below $700, I would still recommend that everyone should buy some physical gold as soon as possible. The last time gold fell below $800 an ounce, many gold bugs turned bearish and started talking about $700 and $600 gold. This was the time when gold had its most spectacular rally, including an $80 move in four hours of trading, ultimately brining the price above $900. Sharp corrections in the gold price are designed to shake out the weak and leveraged players in the market so that the bull is able to charge forward with as few speculators on its back as possible. Those who are waiting for gold to hit $700 or $600 may end up finding themselves left in the dust if they fail to enter the market before the rush into the small asset class. And if gold makes another quick move above $900, those waiting for $700, may then wait for $850 gold. But then if gold surges ahead over $1000, those waiting for cheaper prices will be forced to make a difficult decision. Either they will have to pay a much high price than they were originally hoping, they can pray that the price of gold comes back down to a cheaper price, or they may never buy gold at all and miss out on the bull market. Someone who was thinking of buying at $800, but tried to wait for gold to go to $700 or $600, will ultimately find it difficult to ever justify paying $1000, $1200, $1500, $2000 or more for the same ounce of gold. Therefore, it is much better to be a few days too early, than one day too late. The economic situation is critical enough that it is better to err on the side of caution, rather than risking holding onto worthless dollars. Anyone buying gold at these prices is guaranteed to make money in the long run, so it is not necessary to time the markets perfectly. Those who buy into the gold market now or who are already holding positions should not be scared by further declines in the gold price. Any further drops should be looked at as tremendous buying opportunities because the long term fundamentals for gold show no sign of changing any time soon. There are too many people around the world who understand the severity of what is occurring, and will hold onto gold no matter what. A drop in price will not necessarily lead to more selling, and may in fact encourage more buying instead. Further declines in the gold price may lead to more shortages and higher premiums in the physical markets. So even if investors are waiting to get a cheaper gold price, there is no guarantee that there will be any physical metal available to purchase if the price does fall. With high demand for physical gold and fear of counter party risk, investors are starting to take delivery on COMEX contracts. Many of these contracts are in danger of default which would send the price of gold much higher very quickly. Massive short positions that have to be covered at some point may be forced to go into the tight market to buy the physical product in order to make delivery, resulting in default and/or much higher prices.

I believe that gold prices in the short run will be determined by the US dollar. If the US dollar continues to rise above 83 on the dollar index, then gold prices will likely fall. If this is the case, I expect the declines in gold measured in foreign currencies to not be as severe as US dollar declines, since gold has performed much better lately from the perspective of non-US investors in most foreign currencies. However, if the economic crisis takes another turn for the worse, like the possibility of another large bank failure, a run on the banks, a large company going bankrupt, an entire State (like California) going bankrupt, or even a terrorist attack, war with Iran, flu pandemic, power outages, internet systems crashing, and countless of other unpredictable events could cause a flight into both gold and the dollar, which would both be viewed as a safe haven and could rise in tandem. And there is always the risk of foreigners dumping dollars or big money players buying into the small gold market, both of which could send gold much higher virtually over night.

A further rise in the US dollar will have to compete against Ben Bernake and his money printing. With the Federal Reserve now loaning out an average of $437.5 billion per day, it certainly brings into question how much longer the dollar can strengthen considering that the monetary base is exploding at an unprecedented rate. Central Banks around the world have already pledged to lend out “unlimited” dollars to solve the financial crisis, which should prevent the dollar from strengthening, in addition to the fact that bond yields are incredibly low. The Federal Reserve is trying to pump enough money into the system to fight the credit contraction, and currently, the credit contraction is winning the battle. But I would caution investors who think the Credit Crunch will overpower Helicopter Ben Bernake, for he is the money printing champion of the world and inflationary forces are certain to return with vengeance.

There are good arguments for both gold going lower, and higher in the short run. No one has a crystal ball and is able to predict short term moves with any degree of certainty. In the long run though, the price of gold has to go much higher, which is all that really matters.

The Petro-Dollar Collapse


Another attack on the dollar could come from the seldom discussed and widely misunderstood relationship between the dollar and oil.

Ron Paul explains this relationship in the following speech on the House Floor.

Ron Paul – The End of Dollar Hegemony: Dollar Backed by Oil [February 15th, 2006] (09:54)

Ron Paul – The End of Dollar Hegemony [FULL SPEECH] [February 15th, 2006] (34:49)


After Nixon closed the gold window, the dollar was no longer backed by gold, and many think that the dollar is backed by nothing. I would argue that the dollar is actually backed by oil and the military superiority of the United States, which is necessary to maintain that backing. A deal was made with OPEC in the 1970’s to price oil exclusively in dollars. Since every economy in the world needs oil in order to grow, they therefore need US dollars to buy that oil. As the oil price goes higher, countries now need to accumulate more and more dollars in order to afford the more expensive oil. Even though countries like China have trillions of United States dollars, with oil at $150 a barrel, they would need to have a lot of dollars in order to be able to afford to import all the oil they are going to need to grow. When the price of oil was being projected at over $200 a barrel, many predicting much higher numbers in the long run, the countries around the world would be unable to dump dollars because then they would not be able to import any oil. Looking at the dollar from this perspective, a rise in oil prices should fundamentally increase the value of the dollar, since the commodity backing the dollar is increasing in value. Conversely, a fall in oil prices should fundamentally weaken the value of the US dollar. If oil prices fall to $50 a barrel, countries like China no longer have any use for the trillions of US dollar reserves; because they do not need as many in order meet the oil demand in their country. For this reason, the current expansionary monetary policy combine with the fall in oil prices puts the dollar in a very vulnerable position.

If the dollar to oil relationship (petro-dollar) is maintained, a total collapse in the value of the dollar may be impossible. Devaluation is possible through increasing the supply of oil, reducing the demand for oil, or an inflationary monetary policy where the Federal Reserve prints money at a much faster rate than oil is being pumped out of the ground and being consumed. With excess money printing, like we are seeing today, this should cause the value of the dollar to go down, but also cause the dollar value of oil to go up. Foreign countries will have to make sure they buy enough dollars in order keep up with the rising price of oil. So as long as oil is priced in dollars, it prevents a global run on the dollar. Because as the dollar is devalued, oil becomes more valuable in terms of dollars, requiring the countries to buy more dollars in order to be able to afford the more expensive oil.

So if anyone was still wondering what the real reason was for the invasion of Iraq, they can look no further than Saddam Hussein's decision in the year 2000, to price oil in Euros instead of dollars. Hugo Chavez in Venezuela was considering this move as well, but was then faced with a CIA sponsored coup in an attempt to overthrow the government and prevent them from making this policy decision to stop accepting dollars for their oil. And of course, the most recent oil producing country to stop accepting dollars is Iran, who is now selling their oil for Euros and Yen. Since Iran is such a big oil producing country and are allied with Russia, another large oil producing country, they together could destroy the petro-dollar, causing the US dollar to collapse. If large oil fields open in Northern Russia and Indonesia, for instance, and are allowed to price oil in any foreign currency without risk of US invasion, then the petro-dollar would be destroyed. The United States has over 700 military bases spread out over 130 countries, which are used to police the world, protect US interests in foreign countries, and maintain the dollar oil relationship. If the economic situation deteriorates to the point where the US government is no longer able to maintain their trillion dollar a year empire, the troops would have to come home and the world would be liberated from the petro-dollar stranglehold the US held over the world for the last few decades, which allowed for the imbalances and the phony consumer based American debt economy.

The system that was set up allowed the US government to expand the money supply and run trade and budget deficits for decades. The excess dollars were exported out of the country and were accumulated by people and businesses and stored as reserves in Central Banks around the world. Back when the United States had a sound economy and produced a lot of goods for export, the US dollar was very valuable because it could be converted into gold at a fixed rate of $35 per ounce, it could be used to buy the high quality products that the United States exported, and it could be used to invest in profitable and productive businesses.

These days, the only thing of value that can be bought with US dollars is oil. The world already lost a fortune investing in dot-com stocks and mortgage backed securities, so other than buying oil, there is not very much use for paper dollars. Of course the OPEC countries are the ones who are stuck accumulating vast quantities of these dollars without them being able to buy much with them. The original OPEC deal set up in the 1970’s to price oil in dollars was contingent on the Arab states investing a portion of their dollars back in the United States by loaning the dollars back to America under generous terms and buying up the debt. Dollars that were not used to buy up debt could be spent on US produced military equipment (to strengthen their control over the citizens of their country) and financing the socialistic economies and the lavish lifestyles and magnificent palaces of the princes and sheiks. Can this giant Ponzi scheme go on forever?